
A
report on the annual summer reception of the National Children’s
Bureau
London
was hot and crowded on July. There was still the aftermath of
the bombings, and the police had closed down some of the tube
lines as a precaution, but this did not prevent “business
as usual”, and the NCB held their reception in the Queen
Elizabeth II Conference Centre opposite Westminster Abbey as planned.
The
Minister
The
message was positive. In welcoming Beverley Hughes as the new
Minister for Children and Families, Paul Ennals praised her openness
and clarity of thought, and her ability to cut through nonsense
in getting action. She in turn expressed appreciation for the
NCB’s contribution.
The
Minister said she was staggered by the progress that had been
made and the scale of the commitment shown to provide high quality
services for children. There was a real need to improve outcomes,
she said, and there could be no higher priority. She had been
impressed by the way that people throughout the services had taken
to heart the five main aims outlined in Every Child Matters.
The
priority now was the implementation of those aims through the
early identification of problems and speedy intervention for individual
children, and at organisational level through beacons of good
practice, the creation of partnerships, leadership through children’s
trusts and the involvement of children and young people, their
parents and the wider community in planning.
The
Minister noted the challenge ahead in creating and sustaining
a good workforce fitted for the task. In certain respects it was
insufficient to change standards; a cultural shift was needed
too. The NCB, she said, has a critically important role to play
in achieving these changes.
The
Chief Executive
Paul
Ennals spoke briefly about the NCB’s role. He said the NCB
was “with the Government but not of the Government”.
It had had a massive impact on Government policy, introducing
concepts such as the emphasis on outcomes, children’s trusts,
early support for disabled children, and the importance of health
care for children. It had contributed in a major way to the Youth
Work Green Paper (not yet out), the End Child Poverty campaign,
and the Anti Bullying Alliance, among others.
However,
the NCB retained its independence and felt able to let the Government
know when there was a difference of views or when it felt that
the Government had not gone far enough. Paul instanced work on
residential care, children affected by HIV/AIDs, young offenders
and black and ethnic minority children where further work was
needed. He did not want to dwell on the negatives, however, as
so much positive work was in hand.
The
Children’s Commissioner
Al
Aynsley-Green had been in post for eleven days at this point.
He recognised the high expectations of him, which he found humbling.
Among his first targets were raising awareness of the existence
of the Commission and creating the Commission’s engine.
While a London base was needed, a regional structure was also
required. His budget is only £3 million, but he wanted to
create a research programme as part of the Commission’s
activities.
A
key element throughout his work had to be the involvement of young
people and listening to their views. Their participation –
not just consultation – was needed, and he was giving consideration
to the creation of Assistant Commissioner roles for children and
young people. Issues raised by children to date included safety
and security, bullying, anxiety and stress, sex and racism.
However,
the Commissioner said that he did not want get caught up in off-the-cuff
responses to every problem, but high among his priorities was
the need to create a debate about childhood and the wider community’s
expectations, so that children and young people could become central
to the thinking of the populace at large. He encouraged debate
and wanted to be open to people wishing to contact him.
The
President
Helena
Kennedy announced that it was time for her to terminate her term
of office as President of the NCB, a role she had held for eight
years. Who will succeed her? Watch this space.
During
those eight years, the NCB has had a growing impact on national
policy and legislation, and there is scarcely an issue concerning
children and young people where it has not informed Government
opinion through research and policy development. It has been fortunate
that there has been a Government giving high priority to meeting
children’s needs. The outcome has been that the NCB has
been able to proceed at full steam ahead.