HAWKING AND FLOBBING


by Kathleen Lane

It was a chilly day in West Drayton, with that kind of drizzle that leaves you undecided about whether to get out a n umbrella or not. I had had a depressing visit to a dear friend who is very ill indeed. The estimated time of arrival for the train I wanted was drifting later and later and the nearest seat on the station platform was occupied by two boys, who I guessed were about eleven years old. They were well dressed and had pleasant little faces, but obviously standing up to give older people a seat was outside their cultural expectations. I tried telepathising hostile thoughts, but with no effect.

Then I noticed that they were engaged in a spitting competition. This was something only the very naughtiest boys at my primary school did fifty years ago and I looked on with chilly disapproval. Before long they ran out of spittle and started ‘hawking’ (snorting mucus up their noses) and then ‘flobbing’ (spitting it as far as they could). They were aiming for the yellow line behind which we are supposed to stand to avoid being sucked off the platform by the high speed trains.

After watching a few of these shiny blobs landing on or near the aforementioned yellow line I could keep a safe silence no longer. The bossy teacher, the demanding mother and the deranged grandmother was suddenly saying, “I don’t think that’s a good idea”. Obviously, having been encouraged by the present day educationists not to keep respectful silence but to talk back and ask questions, the junior duo immediately wanted to know why it was not a good idea. They were unimpressed by the notion that people might skid and fall on their slimy offerings. They seemed to think that anyone with any sense would dance nimbly around them.

So, never being one to keep my mouth shut while the going is good, I suggested that they might be spreading germs. Cue next questions, “How?” “What are germs?” Not satisfied by my explanation about nasal passages and mucus they continued their quest for enlightenment. Collectively, we stumbled on the notion that they might look up mucus on the Internet. At least our conversation had slowed down their production, thereby saving some hapless West Drayton commuters from the risk of skidding under a train, if and when one called at the station, or being off work for a few days with a nasty cold as a result of all those jet-propelled germs.

In the further interests of public safety I decided to keep the conversation going a while longer. After all, here were two charming young boys waiting for a train which could take them direct to Paddington Station, or connect them via London Underground with the very heart of our capital city, which is not the most child-friendly or safe place in the world. I asked where they were going. They said they were going to see their auntie, who lived in the next town along the line.

They were surprisingly open and friendly, when I had fully expected to be told to mind my own business. They asked where I was going, but did not seem to have heard of my destination, which was a small town on the Norfolk Coast, nor even of Liverpool Street Station, where I might or might not get a train. They asked what I was doing in West Drayton. Their response to my story about a very sick friend was touchingly sympathetic.

At last the train arrived and I lost sight of the pair. I decided to switch to the Underground at Ealing Broadway, to avoid the walking and climbing up and down stairs which is involved in changing at Paddington. As I sat waiting for the Central Line train to start up, I heard a little voice saying, “Can you spare some change? We’re collecting for ….”

I never found out what my little friends from West Drayton were collecting for, because as they stepped into the carriage where I sat, we had meaningful eye contact and they swiftly stepped out again and disappeared into the crowd on the station. Clearly they had not gone to visit auntie.

I had plenty of time ahead of me to ponder on this experience. I had met two bright and attractive young boys wandering about on their own. They were polite, but not polite enough to give up a seat to an older person. They also appeared to be glib liars and engaged themselves in the high risk activity of begging at a London station.

In view of the recent tragic death of two bright and attractive young girls of roughly the same age in the safe Cambridgeshire village of Soham, I wondered who would allow their children to wander around in the highly unsafe environment of west London.

Did their families know where they were going and what they were going to do? Is it better, or worse, if they did not know, or had been lied to and thought the boys were safely doing something else? What if I had not been a kindly grandmother, but part of some hideous ring? I think it would have been all too easy to entice and entrap these two.

But my final sadness is for all of our children, who are not really safe to go around anywhere without adult supervision these days. Even the idyllic small town on the Norfolk Coast to which I was returning has been invaded by dealers in crack cocaine, which puts us all at risk.

Is it highly unrealistic to wish for a return to a time when children could go out for a day in school holidays with sandwiches and a bottle of pop, walk to and from school, or go to visit friends and family at will? Or are we rightly realistic to chauffeur them, or encourage crouching in front of TVs and computers as a safe option? But therein lie at least two other issues – grooming on the Internet and child obesity.

Has anybody out there got any views ?


 
Would you like to comment on this article? - Click here


The three ages of Man:

He believes in Santa Claus
He doesn't believe in Santa Claus
He is Santa Claus



Top

Main Menu