If
you want to blame someone, there will be quite a lot of people
in the dock. The problem goes back a long way

When
I was at school in the 1950s, we used to have compulsory sport three
afternoons a week on the school playing fields - cricket, rugby or
hockey, depending on the season, and athletics at the start of the
summer term. As a treat - when the playing fields were sodden and
the weather was at its worst - there were occasional cross-country
runs. Then there were the PE lessons in the gym for a double session
once a week. What is more, we had ten minutes of exercises (a sort
of Swedish drill) at the start of our mid-morning break every weekday.
To cap it all, punishments often consisted of runs, press-ups or other
bits of exercise.
There
were a few outstanding individual sportsmen among the pupils and the
school teams did not do badly against other schools, but it was not
a particularly sporty school. The educational theory at the time was
“mens sana in corpore sano” - a healthy mind in a healthy
body. It was unsaid, but in an all-boys school sport was also perhaps
seen as something of a distraction.
The
rot started to set in when the school was inspected. The inspectors
thought that the mid-morning Swedish drill was rather old-fashioned
and unnecessary, and of course the pupils were not displeased to have
a longer mid-morning break without having to stretch, run on the spot
or do legs-astride jumping. So it was done away with.

I
believe it was in the late 1970s that the teaching unions took industrial
action and worked to rule, seeing classroom teaching as the core activity
and declining to offer hobbies, sport and music as part of the education
provided by schools. These activities slumped, and it has taken twenty
years to re-introduce them.
In
the meantime, councils have been able to capitalise on the under-used
playing fields, building on them or selling them off.
Sports
have often become spectator activities, rather than participant, and
children have taken up more sedentary occupations, squatting in front
of their computers. They do not even walk to school as much as they
used to, as parents want to deliver them safely to the school door
by car.

Now,
there are grumbles that an undue number of children are overweight,
and that we are storing up a legacy for them of heart trouble, diabetes,
problems with their joints and a whole raft of other ailments. Indeed,
there are predictions that the average life expectancy of today’s
children will be lower than their parents’.
So
who can we blame for the present sad state of affairs? The children
for eating the wrong food and sitting in front of their playstations
like couch potatoes. Their parents for letting them graze on burgers
and chips and chauffeuring them to school. The teachers for failing
to treat education as something that affects body, mind and spirit.
Their unions for using educational activities as a weapon when true
professionals would put the children first. Council members for selling
off playing fields and squandering irreplaceable public assets. Successive
Governments for failing to give a lead to counteract all these problems.
And me too: I couldn’t stand school sport, and was only too
pleased to opt out.
We’ve
made a real mess of things. A proper educational curriculum should
include a wide range of physical activities, along with all the classroom
teaching, cultural activities and leisure pursuits. Every child should
be able to find things they enjoy, which make them feel good physically,
which help them to develop and where they can gain a sense of achievement.
If education is to prepare children and young people to become fully
functioning adults, it needs to include sport and other physical activities.
The schools need the facilities, and there needs to be scope for children
to follow up their interests as spare time leisure activities as well.
I
gather that classes which start with exercises find the children are
more alert and attentive. So let’s get back to the compulsory
Swedish drill as well.