Wonderful
Copenhagen
It
has taken fifty years for it to happen, but on Tuesday 27th
May 2003 the three leading international professional bodies
in the social field met together for the first time. There were
senior representatives of the
International
Federation of Social Workers (IFSW), the International Association
of Social Educators (AIEJI) and the Federation Internationale
Des Communautes Educatives (FICE). It was therefore an historic
occasion.
To
an outsider it might also seem an occasion for shame. That it
has taken so long for them to come together is a disgrace. In
international matters, alliances are important if one wishes
to carry influence. Social matters always carry a very low priority
by comparison with politics, big business and military matters,
and we need to have maximum impact if we are to be listened
to, and if the needs of people at the bottom of the social heap
are to receive attention.
Success
Although
it has taken too long to come together, the meeting was a success
in four ways. First, there was a genuine enthusiasm to work
co-operatively on issues where the different associations can
contribute from their differing viewpoints. In the past there
has at times been rivalry. It was once said that seven people
would have to die before two organisations would work together;
there was no such animosity at this meeting, and no-one was
trying to carve out patches for themselves.
Secondly,
there was an appreciation that any international organisation
in this field has to struggle to achieve success. There are
hardly any paid staff and so virtually all the work has to be
done by volunteers. Most of the volunteers have full-time jobs
and responsibilities in their national associations, as well
as in the international roles they fulfil. To find the time
and the resources to hold a meeting with other associations
is one more task, and so it is perhaps not so surprising that
time has not been found in the past.
Thirdly,
it was found that there are many areas of common interest between
the organisations. To give just two examples, IFSW are revising
their Code of Ethics at a time when AIEJI are putting theirs
out for consultation, offering a chance for both organisations
to take account of each other’s thinking before finalising
their Codes. The ideal - one day - might be for all the associations
to share the same Code of Ethics, but for the present, sharing
ideas will be useful.
All
three associations have been giving thought to what FICE terms
Education sans Frontieres, but all three have struggled to find
a model they could implement. The idea is that after natural
disasters or man-made crises, communities need help to re-establish
their social infrastructures through support and expert advice
as well as practical help. Out of their hundreds of thousands
of members, organisations such as IFSW, AIEJI and FICE have
hundreds of professionals prepared to respond to calls for help,
but what is needed is the data base listing their skills, experience
and contact details and the organisation to trigger the response.
For organisations with limited resources, this is a hard task,
but it is possible that it might be managed on a joint basis.
This is a matter for further discussion.
Fourthly,
there was an appreciation that all three of the organisations
face similar problems - shortage of resources, over-reliance
on volunteer workers, tensions between international and continental
levels, communication problems and getting feedback to discussion
documents, for example.
Action
Ahead
It
was agreed that further meetings should be held, with a view
to closer collaboration, and hopefully there will be a greater
impact if policies and declarations are agreed and promulgated
by the three main professional bodies.
Thanks
are due not only to the three organisations but also to the
Socialpaedagogernes Landsforbund, the main Danish trade union
for social workers and social educators / pedagogues, who acted
as hosts, providing a congenial setting for the meeting. Whether
the event proves useful, only time will tell, but its success
will no doubt depend upon hard work and time put in by people
who already have many other commitments. Yet the impact of such
meetings could well be vital if the social professions are to
have the right sort of international impact on behalf of the
people they serve.