A monthly column, made up of a miscellany of small
stories, comment on the news, funnies etc.

 



Classics about Children

The children who appear in most classics – Winnie the Pooh, Peter Pan, the Famous Five and so on – are fairly cardboardy. They may have quirks and say funny things, but there is very little character development, and indeed not a lot of character either in some cases.

The creation of complex characters for children is a recent invention. We remember The Catcher in the Rye by John Salinger as a breath of fresh air. Here was a mixed-up kid struggling with growing up and the realities of life. It was not only a good read, but it managed to be both very funny and embarrassing as you felt for the teenage hero.

A recent Guardian article was praising High Winds in Jamaica for its accurate portrayal of childhood, and it brought back memories of Chris Beedell, who used to use the book for teaching childcare workers.

The Guardian was arguing that we are currently in a golden age of children’s writing, just as Shakespeare’s day was a peak time for theatre and the nineteenth century for novels. Certainly there are a lot of books for and about children now which take their life experience and viewpoint seriously. In these books, life is not idyllic but the sort of mixture of experiences which people go through as they develop in childhood and adolescence.

They include Adrian Mole, the ultimate spotty adolescent, Tracy Beaker, who is managing to popularise life in care, Harry Potter and his magic chums, and the hero and heroine of Philip Pullman’s His Dark Materials, which seems to have been written both for children and adults. They all make excellent reading and are selling millions.

We are behind the times in recommending The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-time by Mark Haddon, as it was published in 2003 and has already won the Whitbread Book of the Year. Yet it certainly does deserve commendation. It is a gripping detective work of sorts, yet it is about an ordinary family with all its problems. The most brilliant aspect, though, is that the person telling the story is a teenage boy with Asperger’s Syndrome and (though we aren’t experts about the Syndrome) the whole thing rings true, including uncomprehending descriptions of events viewed from the blinkered perspective of someone who cannot read feelings. Adults can’t put the book down, despite its unspectacular subject matter, and the book, originally aimed at the children’s market has now been re-issued and aimed at adults.

All in all, the wealth of books about and for children has to be a Good Thing.

Encouraging Boys to Read

Still on the subject of books for children, boys are known to be some of the most reluctant readers around – especially of primary age. Once they have got to grips with reading, it can be tough to find stories that keep them interested. Girls have always been more avid readers and the key age for getting – and keeping – children interested is around seven or eight. Watch a child of that age suddenly realise what books have to offer and it’s like witnessing the proverbial lightbulb moment.

If you’ve a reluctant reader in your midst then the new Secret Agent Jack Stalwart series may entice them into the world of fiction. Written by Elizabeth Singer-Hunt, these stories run to around 80 pages – short enough to be manageable, long enough to give a sense of achievement on completion. Young Jack is a member of the Global Protection Force and sets out to save the world and solve mysteries. They’re published by Chubby Cheeks www.chubbycheekspublications.co.uk

Toothpaste by Numbers

Gus Greene’s piece this month talks of teeth-cleaning. This is an important subject in providing care for children. There is, of course, the obvious point about dental hygiene. The Regulations say that children should have adequate dental care, and although that may sound obvious it has not always happened.

What the national picture is now because of the shortage of dentists we do not know. At one time there were annual dental check-ups as a matter of course, but more recently it seems that children’s rights have been used as an argument for letting children decide if they need dental care, which has easily slipped into the laissez-faire approach of letting the children say if they need attention and otherwise not bothering.

Going back to the seventies, we recall a children’s home where they were all known by numbers, not names, and for their squeeze of toothpaste, as for everything else in the home, they had to line up numerically. The teeth-cleaning ritual was so significant that one of the classics on childcare was entitled After Grace, Teeth. Grace? There’s another topic.

Nothing to do with Childcare?

Have you noticed that people usually like the gardens at the front of their houses to look smart even when they are not so bothered about their back gardens? As for where properties face onto railways, they mostly don’t give a damn, even though thousands of commuters may see the rubbish they have dumped over the fences at the bottom of their gardens every day.

It’s the same for the authorities. Councils spend thousands on civic gardens, roundabouts etc., but do nothing to tidy up the view or plant flowers to be seen from passing trains.

Is it because passengers are sealed into their trains and there is no physical relationship perceived between them and the geography they are passing through - except at stations where there are often nice little gardens?

There are loads of tourists who travel on our trains. Perhaps for their sakes, as well as for those of the travelling public, we should start a campaign to beautify the railways.

Nothing to do with children? Well, it would affect the physical legacy we pass on and would demonstrate our concern for the environment to our children. It’s no wonder that young people – or at least, we assume it is young people – spray-paint graffiti initials to mark out their territory like dogs, if adults do nothing to make it look better.

Did you see?...

..... Supernanny still at it, miraculously sorting out families and making children like discipline on Channel 4. We wonder whether she makes it look too easy. Certainly, children need a degree of order to feel secure. Otherwise they can go wild. But if the disorder reflects long-standing personality traits on the part of the parents, these are not problems that can be sorted in the twinkling of an eye. Supernanny can show the parents how to do a three-point-turn in their relationships with their children, but they will still have a lot of difficult traffic to negotiate ahead.

... Professor Jean la Fontaine’s article in Community Care (7 April 2005, pp. 38-39) telling us not to panic about paedophile rings? She was the author of the report which debunked ritual abuse. The social work profession had had to come to terms with “battered babies” and then with sexual abuse by family members, both of which had been concepts which it was hard to believe on the scale which emerged.

The idea of satanic circles abusing children and frightening everyone into silence then emerged. Concerned that here was another form of abuse of which they were unaware, many social workers accepted its existence, and the campaign to out satanic abuse verged on a witch hunt. Since Professor la Fontaine’s report, we have heard of no more cases.

However, her article is now questioning whether paedophile rings exist. We think that she is wrong this time. She claims in her article that inconsistencies in the evidence of the people who were formerly children in care showed “their accounts to be, at best fantasies and at worst lies”. There may have been some inconsistencies, fantasies and lies, but our experience is that there is a lot of solid evidence of abuse, and when painful memories are being trawled up after thirty years, is it any surprise that some dates and names become garbled? There may not be many instances of organised rings of paedophiles, but there have been times when they have been aware of each others’ abuse of children in care and when regimes have enabled individual staff members to abuse children.

When children are abused, it is bad. When damaged children are abused again in care instead of being protected, it is worse. When, years later, they are accused of fantasies and lies, it compounds the original abuse still further.

... the news item about trampolines? Apparently, since 1997 the number of accidents involving children has more than quadrupled, perhaps because they are sited unsuitably or because several children are using them at the same time. Our suspicion is that they are set up by delinquent parents with video cameras trying to earn a few quid by selling pictures of the accidents to television shows.

...the last Dr Who episode when the 'Prime Minister' announced to the world that the aliens who had invaded the earth had "massive weapons of destruction" which could be "mobilised in 45 seconds." Nice one!

 

From an Insurance Policy

Heading about insuring adventure activities for children :

Dingy and Small Craft

Cheaper to insure than large brightly-painted ones?


 Would you like to comment on anything in News Views?
click here

 




Top

Main Menu